MAPPING INDIA’S COMMODITY EXPORT NETWORK: SECTORAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND BEHAVIOR AT TAIL DISTRIBUTION WITH LEADING GLOBAL ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Musthafa KS Assistant Professor, NAM College Kallikandy, Kannur, Kerala, India Muhammed Author
  • Mikhdad KG Graduate Scholar, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • Amina Kurikkal Madathil Musthafa Graduate Scholar, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iitmjbs.2025.12.1.1

Keywords:

Quantile-Quantile Connectedness, Economic Interdependence, Network Graphs, Merchandise Trade, Global Economies, Non Linear Interconnections, Export Network

Abstract

This study investigates the interconnectedness  of India’s commodity exports with thirteen  major global economies from 2000 to 2023,  employing the quantile-quantile connectedness  approach. The analysis, illustrated through an  extensive network graph, highlights significant  variations and dependencies across three  economic indicators, particularly in extreme  distribution scenarios across various export  categories. Our findings reveal convoluted non linear and multiscale interdependencies that  elucidate global economic behavior, especially  in India’s bilateral trade relationships. Economic  Policy Uncertainty (EPU), Consumer Price  Index (CPI), and Producer Price Index (PPI) of  destination countries have a decisive role in the  export network, alongside key export categories  such as Petroleum, Agriculture, Ores, and  Manufacturing, underscoring India’s pivotal role  within the global commodity export network.  Furthermore, Principal Component Analysis  

(PCA) is utilized to consolidate economic  variable outcomes into a singular, interpretable  metric for each commodity category. These  results underscore the significance of extreme  economic conditions and tail dependencies  in shaping policy, with critical implications  for international trade and economic strategy.  This study’s methodological and sector-specific  insights offer valuable guidance to policymakers  and economists in understanding global  economic interdependence and crafting more  resilient trade and economic policies. 

References

Bagchi, B., Ghosh, R., & Kanrar, A. (2023). Contagion or interdependence? Evidence from Asian emerging stock markets in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Business and Economics Review, 28(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2023.128855

Baruník, J., & Křehlík, T. (2018). Measuring the frequency dynamics of financial connectedness and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 16(2), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nby001

Bekhet, H. (2009). Assessing economic connectedness degree of the Malaysian economy: Input-output model approach. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v1n2p134

Bonaime, A., Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2018). Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions? Journal of Financial Economics, 129(3), 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.007

Bouri, E., Saeed, T., Vo, X. V., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Quantile connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 71, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101302

Čižmešija, M., & Škrinjarić, T. (2021). Economic sentiment and business cycles: A spillover methodology approach. Economic Systems, 45(3), 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2021.100770

Çolak, G., Durnev, A., & Qian, Y. (2017). Political uncertainty and IPO activity: Evidence from US gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(6), 2523–2564. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000366

Demir, E., & Ersan, O. (2017). Economic policy uncertainty and cash holdings: Evidence from BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Review, 33, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2017.01.003

Emmert-Streib, F., Musa, A., Baltakys, K., Kanniainen, J., Tripathi, S., Yli-Harja, O., Jodlbauer, H., & Dehmer, M. (2017a). Computational analysis of the structural properties of economic and financial networks (No. arXiv:1710.04455). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.04455

Emmert-Streib, F., Musa, A., Baltakys, K., Kanniainen, J., Tripathi, S., Yli-Harja, O., Jodlbauer, H., & Dehmer, M. (2017b). Computational analysis of the structural properties of economic and financial networks (No. arXiv:1710.04455). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.04455

Guan, J., Xu, X., Wu, S., & Xing, L. (2018). Measurement and simulation of the relatively competitive advantages and weaknesses between economies based on bipartite graph theory. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0197575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197575

Gupta, R., Lahiani, A., Lee, C.-C., & Lee, C.-C. (2019). Asymmetric dynamics of insurance premium: The impacts of output and economic policy uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 57(6), 1959–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1539-z

Hassan, S., Shabi, S., & Choudhry, T. (2018). Asymmetry, uncertainty and international trade. Swansea University, School of Management Working Paper, 24. https://rahwebdav.swan.ac.uk/repec/pdf/WP2018-24.pdf

Huang, J., & Slomczynski, K. (2003). The dimensionality and measurement of economic dependency: A research note. International Journal of Sociology, 33, 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.2003.11770277

Istiak, K., & Alam, M. R. (2019). Oil prices, policy uncertainty and asymmetries in inflation expectations. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(2), 324–334.

Jens, C. E. (2017). Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from U.S. gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 563–579.

Kelly, B., Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2016). The price of political uncertainty: Theory and evidence from the option market. Journal of Finance, 71(5), 2417–2480.

Moten, M. (n.d.). Developing functional networks of frontier capital markets. Academia.edu. Retrieved August 24, 2024, from https://www.academia.edu/29928423/Developing_Functional_Networks_of_Frontier_Capital_Markets

Nguyen, N. H., & Phan, H. V. (2017). Policy uncertainty and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 613–644.

Panousi, V., & Papanikolaou, D. (2012). Investment, idiosyncratic risk, and ownership. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1113–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01743.x

Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007

Phan, H. V., Nguyen, N. H., Nguyen, H. T., & Hegde, S. (2019). Policy uncertainty and firm cash holdings. Journal of Business Research, 95, 71–82.

Raddant, M., & Kenett, D. Y. (2021). Interconnectedness in the global financial market. Journal of International Money and Finance, 110, 102280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102280

Su, C.-W., Khan, K., Lobont, O. R., & Sung, H.-C. (2016). Is there any relationship between producer price index and consumer price index in Slovakia? A bootstrap rolling approach. Economic Modelling, 64, 611–628.

Walkup, B. (2016). The impact of uncertainty on payout policy. Managerial Finance, 42(11), 1054–1072.

Xu, C., Ke, J., Zhao, X., & Zhao, X. (2020). Multiscale quantile correlation coefficient: Measuring tail dependence of financial time series. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124908

Zhao, Y., & Park, I. M. (2017). Variational latent Gaussian process for recovering single-trial dynamics from population spike trains. Neural Computation, 29(5), 1293–1316.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

MAPPING INDIA’S COMMODITY EXPORT NETWORK: SECTORAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND BEHAVIOR AT TAIL DISTRIBUTION WITH LEADING GLOBAL ECONOMIES . (2025). IITM Journal of Business Studies, 12(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.48165/iitmjbs.2025.12.1.1